White Home: Intel on Russian ‘bounties’ on US troops shaky


However on Thursday, White Home press secretary Jen Psaki stated that after a overview of these categorized stories, the intelligence neighborhood decided it had solely “low to average confidence” of their authenticity. She stated that was due partly to the methods through which the intelligence was obtained, together with from interrogations of Afghan detainees.

In June, The Related Press reported that Trump White Home officers have been briefed on intelligence about potential bounties in 2019 and once more in 2020. Then-national safety adviser Robert O’Brien stated Trump himself had not been briefed on the matter as a result of the intelligence stories “haven’t been verified.” U.S. navy commanders on the time additionally stated the uncooked intelligence didn’t cause them to change their pressure safety posture in Afghanistan.

The intelligence assessments have been first reported by The New York Occasions and prompted candidate Biden to repeatedly cost that Trump had deserted U.S. troops by not forcefully responding to the intelligence assessments.

“His total presidency has been a present to Putin, however that is past the pale,” Biden stated of Trump final June, days after the stories first appeared. “It’s a betrayal of probably the most sacred responsibility we bear as a nation to guard and equip our troops once we ship them into hurt’s means. It’s a betrayal of each single American household with a liked one serving in Afghanistan or anyplace abroad.”

Biden raised the topic of the reported bounties on U.S. troops throughout his first name with Putin on Jan. 26, the White Home stated on the time. No point out of the subject was revealed by the White Home after their newest name on Tuesday.

Protection officers and navy commanders repeatedly stated that the stories of bounties had not been corroborated by protection intelligence companies and that they weren’t satisfied the stories have been credible. In addition they stated they didn’t consider any bounties resulted in U.S. navy deaths.

The White Home stated Thursday’s sanctions have been in response to Russia’s interference in U.S. elections, crackdown on dissidents, cyberintrusions and its occupation of Crimea — however not the reported “bounties” positioned on American troops.

“The explanation that they’ve low to average confidence on this judgment is partly as a result of it depends on detainee reporting, and because of the difficult atmosphere and likewise because of the difficult working atmosphere in Afghanistan,” Psaki stated. “So it’s difficult to assemble this intelligence and this information.”

Psaki added that U.S. intelligence has proof that Russian navy intelligence, often called the GRU, interacts with people in Afghan prison networks.

“This data actually places the burden on Russia and the Russian authorities to clarify their engagement right here,” she stated.

Copyright 2021 The Related Press. All rights reserved. This materials is probably not printed, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed with out permission.



Supply hyperlink

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *