However on Thursday, White Home press secretary Jen Psaki mentioned that after a assessment of these categorized reviews, the intelligence group decided it had solely “low to reasonable confidence” of their authenticity. She mentioned that was due partially to the methods during which the intelligence was obtained, together with from interrogations of Afghan detainees.
In June, The Related Press reported that Trump White Home officers had been briefed on intelligence about potential bounties in 2019 and once more in 2020. Then-national safety adviser Robert O’Brien mentioned Trump himself had not been briefed on the matter as a result of the intelligence reviews “haven’t been verified.” U.S. army commanders on the time additionally mentioned the uncooked intelligence didn’t make them change their drive safety posture in Afghanistan.
The intelligence assessments had been first reported by The New York Occasions and prompted candidate Biden to repeatedly cost that Trump had deserted U.S. troops by not forcefully responding to the intelligence assessments.
“His complete presidency has been a present to Putin, however that is past the pale,” Biden mentioned of Trump final June, days after the reviews first appeared. “It’s a betrayal of essentially the most sacred obligation we bear as a nation to guard and equip our troops once we ship them into hurt’s method. It’s a betrayal of each single American household with a beloved one serving in Afghanistan or wherever abroad.”
Biden raised the topic of the reported bounties on U.S. troops throughout his first name with Putin on Jan. 26, the White Home mentioned on the time. No point out of the subject was revealed by the White Home after their newest name on Tuesday.
U.S. army commanders final summer time mentioned the uncooked intelligence didn’t make them change their drive safety posture.
The White Home mentioned Thursday’s sanctions had been in response to Russia’s interference in U.S. elections, crackdown on dissidents, cyberintrusions and its occupation of Crimea — however not the reported “bounties” positioned on American troops.
“The explanation that they’ve low to reasonable confidence on this judgment is partially as a result of it depends on detainee reporting, and as a result of difficult setting and in addition as a result of difficult working setting in Afghanistan,” Psaki mentioned. “So it’s difficult to assemble this intelligence and this knowledge.”
Psaki added that U.S. intelligence has proof that Russian army intelligence, generally known as the GRU, interacts with people in Afghan legal networks.
“This info actually places the burden on Russia and the Russian authorities to elucidate their engagement right here,” she mentioned.
Copyright 2021 The Related Press. All rights reserved. This materials is probably not printed, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed with out permission.